Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents
• Standard Number: 1910.1030(c)(4)(ii)(A)


OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at http://www.osha.gov.


July 15, 1999

Ms. Gail Stout
Virgo Publishing
3300 N. Central Ave., Suite 2500
Phoenix, AZ 85012

Dear Ms. Stout,

Thank you for your letter of May 28, 1999 to John Miles, former Director of the [Directorate of Enforcement Programs]. You requested a written reply regarding the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) current position on disinfectant products which are approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and registered for both HIV and HBV.

OSHA's National Office sent a memorandum to its field offices on November 1, 1996 regarding inquiries from companies who manufactured and/or supplied product(s) approved by the EPA as effective against HBV and HIV. They inquired if the new EPA registered products with the new EPA label would be an "appropriate disinfectant" under OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogen Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1030. This memo stated the products could be used under limited conditions, specifically where HIV and HBV were the only pathogens of concern (for example, in a research setting). Mr. Bach referred to this memorandum in his