Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1904; 1904.7(b)|
November 15, 2005
Mr. Steve M. Olson
Vice President, Safety and Training
Nabors Well Services Ltd.
515 West Greens Rd., Suite 1170
Houston, TX 77067
Dear Mr. Olson:
Thank you for your letter of July 15, 2005 concerning OSHA's occupational injury and illness recordkeeping regulation at 29 CFR 1904. Your letter raises the issue of whether an employer may rely on a second medical opinion from a health care provider in determining whether to record a work-related injury or illness under Part 1904. Your letter states the question as follows:
When making an injury or illness recordkeeping decision, may an employer use the opinion of a contemporaneous second provider (i.e., a physician who specializes in occupational injury and illness) even though the employee already received a prescription medication (medical treatment) from an emergency room physician?Section 1904.7(b) states that a work-related injury or illness must be recorded on the OSHA 300 Log if it results in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job, medical treatment beyond first aid, loss of consciousness, or diagnosis of a serious injury or illness. In certain circumstances, OSHA's recordkeeping requirements permit an employer to choose between two conflicting medical opinions. When an employer receives contemporaneous recommendations from two or more physicians or other licensed health care professionals about the need for medical treatment, the employer may decide which recommendation is the most authoritative and record the case based on that recommendation. However, once a prescription medication has been provided, the case must be recorded.
OSHA has addressed this specific issue in a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) to the Part 1904 recordkeeping requirements on OSHA's website at