Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1910.269; 1910.269(p)(1)(iii)|
February 1, 2008
Mr. Dwight Miller
Consolidated Electric Cooperative
5255 St. Rt. 95
Mt. Gilead, OH 43338
Dear Mr. Miller:
Thank you for your letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA's) Directorate of Enforcement Programs (DEP) regarding the Electric power generation, transmission and distribution standard, 29 CFR 1910.269. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation only of the requirements discussed and may not be applicable to any questions not delineated within your original correspondence.
Your question relates to 1910.269(p)(1)(iii), which prohibits the operator of an electric line truck from leaving his or her position at the controls while a load is suspended unless the employer can demonstrate that no employee (including the operator) might be endangered. Your paraphrased question and our reply follow:
Question: If a pole (that is not close to energized lines) is suspended about 3 or 4 feet off the ground (while it is being framed out) and the operator shuts the truck off and disables the controls, would this be sufficient means of demonstrating that no employee would be endangered?
Reply: No. Shutting the truck off and disabling the controls is not, alone, a sufficient means of demonstrating that no employee would be endangered under 1910.269(p)(1)(iii). The purpose of 1910.269(p)(1)(iii) is to ensure that the operator is at the controls to promptly take corrective action in the event an emergency situation arises that necessitates moving the suspended load, e.g., if wind or unstable soil causes the load to start to tip. See 59 FR 4320, 4399 (Jan. 31,