Speeches - (Archived) Table of Contents
• Information Date: 07/06/1998
• Presented To: Southern Association of Workers' Compensation Administration
• Speaker: Jeffress, Charles N.
• Status: Archived

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

Charles N. Jeffress
Southern Association of Workers'
Compensation Administrators
50th Annual Convention
July 6, 1998

  • How do you define success? For Steven Spielberg, it's making a summer blockbuster. For Bill Gates, it's getting Windows 98 loaded onto millions of PCs. For Jana Novotna, it's winning Wimbledon.
  • For those of us who care about occupational safety and health, success is working ourselves out of a job! We want all workers to do their jobs in safe and healthful environments. And we want to prevent every injury and illness.
  • That may be the impossible dream. But we won't stop trying. The best way to pursue that dream is by joining forces against our common enemy­workplace injuries and illnesses.
  • I'd like to expand OSHA's efforts to work in partnership with workers' compensation administrators. I know our successful partnership in North Carolina benefitted both employers and employees. And I want to thank Howard Bunn, Chairman of the North Carolina Industrial Commission, for inviting me to join you this year.
  • For fifty years, you've been gathering to share ways to better administer workers' compensation programs. You want to help workers who have been injured recuperate and return to work. And you want to provide for those whose lives have been forever changed by a disabling injury or the loss of a family member.
  • Our goal is similar. We know what we need to do­identify the hazards that hurt people and pinpoint the employers with the most problems. Then we need to focus our efforts on those situations.
  • Today, OSHA covers more than 100 million workers at 6 million sites. Together with
  • states running their own OSHA programs, we have about 2,000 inspectors or one inspector for every 3,000 worksites and every 50,000 employees. At a rate of roughly 90,000 inspections per year, we'd visit each worksite once every 66 years! Clearly, if workplace safety and health depends upon inspections alone, we're not going to succeed.

  • That's why we must concentrate on results rather than activities. We must bridge the gap between our resources and our responsibilities. We need to leverage our resources to multiply our results.
  • We have experienced some success, and we can build on that foundation. As Pearl Buck once said, "One faces the future with one's past."
  • Since OSHA was created 27 years ago, workplace fatalities have been cut in half. Occupational injury and illness rates have been declining for the past five years, dropping in 1996 to the lowest level on record.
  • But we need to press on. The numbers and the stories of individuals cross your desk and mine every day. And they remain devastating. Nearly 50 American workers are injured every minute of each 40-hour workweek. Almost 17 die each day. We must all do better.
  • Education is one key to success. State workers compensation agencies have excelled in that area. I know in North Carolina our school for workers and employers offers a model for cooperation between the OSHA program and the Industrial Commission. I would like to see OSHA partner with each of you in providing information and training to employers and employees.
  • At OSHA, we are looking at success in very practical, measurable terms as stated in our five-year strategic plan. One of our goals is to help employers in 100,000 workplaces where we initiate a major intervention to reduce their injury and illness rates by 20 percent over the next five years. We're also striving for a 15-percent reduction in injuries and illnesses among five high hazard industries­food processing, nursing homes, shipyards, logging and construction. And we're seeking a 15-percent reduction in three specific injuries and illnesses­silicosis, amputations and lead poisoning.
  • But perhaps our most important goal is fostering a workplace culture that views worker safety and health as an inherent part of work.

  • That means a safety and health program. Safety and health programs are the critical difference between employers with high injury rates and those with low rates. In North Carolina, we only found a few more hazards at sites with high workers' comp claims than at those with low injury rates. It wasn't the number of hazards that resulted in the higher rate of injuries; it was the lack of an effective safety and health program. That finding made me a believer.
  • Yoggi Berra is reputed to have said, "If you don't know where you're going, you won't get there." A safety and health program not only pinpoints the destination, it serves as the road map for getting there. Every workplace should have one.
  • At OSHA we are using every opportunity to encourage employers to establish safety and health programs. The Cooperative Compliance Program is OSHA's primary strategy to build partnership with employers who most need our intervention. CCP would offer a reduced chance of inspection to employers with high injury and illness rates in exchange for establishing or improving a safety and health program for workers.
  • Unfortunately, CCP is on hold right now as the result of a judicial stay. The challenge to CCP brought by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other trade associations will probably not be resolved until early next year. So, we've moved to Plan B.
  • On April 13, we launched our interim inspection targeting system, inspecting employers who reported to us high rates of injuries and illnesses. Although not as effective as the CCP, it is still a major improvement over our old method od random selection.
  • The key to CCP, and to our interim targeting program, is site-specific data. Our pilot projects in Maine and Wisconsin were based on workers' comp data. I have found your data to be most helpful. But it differs somewhat from state to state. It's not available to OSHA from every state. And since it meets the unique needs of each state program, it's not presented the same way from state to state. So, OSHA began its own data initiative.
  • Last year, we surveyed 80,000 employers in manufacturing and 14 additional high hazard industries. We identified 12,000 specific worksites that had experienced at least twice the average rate of injuries and illnesses. Those are the companies we invited to participate in CCP. More than 10,000 agreed to join us. Once the stay is lifted, we intend to resume this program.
  • CCP offers employers with high injury rates an incentive to implement a safety and health program. But in some ways, it's a stopgap measure. What we really need is a safety and health program standard. Developing one is my top standard-setting priority.
  • Before I leave office, I want an effective safety and health program to become a fundamental responsibility of every employer in the country. That's the only way to ensure ongoing progress in workplace safety and health.
  • Our proposed safety and health program standard will incorporate five key elements: management leadership; employee participation; hazard assessment; hazard prevention and control; and information and training. And it will be flexible, with appropriate expectations for companies of different sizes in different industries. We hope to have a proposal out for comment later this year.
  • Another top priority for me is promulgating an ergonomics standard. I think we need a standard, and I think we can put one together that will reduce pain and disability, without costing employers an arm and a leg.
  • More than one of every five illnesses and lost-time injuries in 1996 resulted from repetitive motion or overexertion. These painful, debilitating injuries often require lengthy recoveries. In 1996, forty percent of workers who developed carpal tunnel syndrome were off the job for 30 days or longer. The financial cost is staggering­billions of dollars in direct and indirect costs. You know these numbers better than I do.
  • OSHA is planning a focused standard under the umbrella of general industry. And in this first phase, we're going to draw the lines narrowly, limiting coverage to those operations, jobs and tasks where there are high rates of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. We will also zero in on situations where successful solutions have been identified.
  • We held a series of stakeholder meetings in Washington in early February to share our preliminary thinking with business, labor and those in the safety and health field. We will be meeting with stakeholders again in two weeks to explore options for some of the more difficult issues. If you would like to observe, one meeting will be in Atlanta on July 23.
  • Let me stress though that we are still a long way from publishing a proposal in the Federal Register. The earliest we could publish would be next summer. We still must draft regulatory text, a preamble to explain the text and then clear the package with the Department of Labor, perhaps a small business review panel and the Office of Management and Budget.
  • In addition to developing a standard, we are continuing our outreach and education efforts through a series of the regional effective practices conferences. We have held eight in the last 10 months, and three more are scheduled this year­including one in September in Atlanta.
  • As you know, we are also working to revise our recordkeeping rule. We're on target to publish next spring. Then we will be gearing up for a major education effort during the last half of 1999 before the rule takes effect in January 2000.
  • Of course, not every safety and health issue requires a standard. This spring we issued recommendations to prevent violence in late night retail establishments. We're developing guidance on latex allergies. And labor-management agreements can address some issues­like asphalt paving fumes, for example.
  • Another issue that we've begun to examine is safety incentive programs. Do they work? Are they a sound strategy for behavior modification? Or are they a gimmick to discourage workers from reporting work-related injuries or illnesses? As you know, some of these programs reward improved safety practices while others offer premiums for decreases in the number of injuries and illnesses reported.
  • At the request of the National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health, we've asked a contractor to review the scientific literature on this issue. We are reviewing the initial draft report now. We expect to receive a final report in August.
  • I think we are seeing changes in how employers and workers are handling return to work after on-the-job injuries. Instead of remaining home on workers' comp until recovery is complete, more people are returning to restricted duty. That's good because workers can collect full pay instead of two-thirds. But we need to watch this trend closely. This approach can be misused.
  • We have made many changes in OSHA to focus on results rather than activities. We know our success depends upon these changes. There are also other changes I'd like to see­changes that require Congressional action to amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
  • We need to cover public employees­federal, state and local­in all states, not just the 23 that run their own OSHA programs. I value our state partners, and I want to see state OSHA programs continue. But not every state has chosen to operate one. That leaves hundreds of thousands of state and local government workers with no one to turn to with a safety or health problem at their job.
  • Whistleblowers need more protections. And we need stiffer criminal penalties­from a misdemeanor to a felony­for employers whose willful conduct causes the death of an employee.
  • We're moving forward in OSHA. We've put in place programs to measure our progress. Now we must continue to deliver on our promise­to send every worker home whole and healthy every day.
  • I appreciate your commitment to this goal, and I promise you our cooperation as we work toward our common objectives.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

Speeches - (Archived) Table of Contents

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.