Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19100119 E03 V Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals.
Inspection Nr: 1113807.015
Citation: 01011
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Date: 12/31/2017 2
Initial Penalty: $4,410.00
Current Penalty: $4,410.00
Issuance Date: 06/17/2016
Nr Instances: 6
Nr Exposed: 33
Related Event Code (REC):
Gravity: 10
Report ID: 0522500
Contest Date: 07/07/2016
Final Order: 01/17/2018
Emphasis:
Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Penalty | F: Formal Settlement | 01/17/2018 | $4,410.00 | 12/31/2017 | Serious | |
Penalty | C: Contested | 07/11/2016 | $4,410.00 | 07/22/2016 | Serious | |
Penalty | Z: Issued | 06/17/2016 | $4,410.00 | 07/22/2016 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 011 Hazard:
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3): The process hazard analysis shall address: 29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(v): Facility siting: a. As of December 21, 2015, the employer's original 2004 Phytosterol PHA and PHA addendums made in 2007 and 2008, did not address facility siting. b. As of December 21, 2015, the employer's Final PHA Study Report of the Sterols Plant dated June 2011 did not adequately address facility siting, in that it did not have a completed facility siting checklist and it did not address the hazards, including but not limited to the following: location; unit layout; storage/warehouses; spacing between process components; control rooms; occupied buildings; unit location relative to surroundings; emergency stations; contingency planning; electrical classification; ventilation; location of emergency relief venting; and evacuation routes through perimeter fencing surrounding the covered process. c. As of January 22, 2016, the employer's Final Re-Do PHA Study Report of the Sterols Process dated January 2016 did not adequately address facility siting, in that it did not have a completed facility siting checklist and it did not address the hazards, including but not limited to the following: location; unit layout; storage/warehouses; spacing between process components; control rooms; occupied buildings; unit location relative to surroundings; emergency stations; contingency planning; electrical classification; ventilation; location of emergency relief venting; and evacuation routes through perimeter fencing surrounding the covered process. d. As of December 21, 2015, the employer's Final PHA Study Report of the Sterols Plant dated June 2011 did not adequately address facility siting, in that it did not address the hazards associated with the emergency relief of the TK 0202-00 Crystallization (XTAL) Slurry Storage Tank, discharging at the top of the vessel. e. As of December 21, 2015, the employer's Final PHA Study Report of the Sterols Plant dated June 2011 did not adequately address facility siting, in that it did not address the hazards associated with the emergency relief of the stripped TK 0406-00 FAME Solvent Receiver, discharging to the ground. f. As of December 21, 2015, the employer's Final PHA Study Report of the Sterols Plant dated June 2011 did not adequately address facility siting in that it did not address the hazards associated with the emergency relief of the TK-0405-00 FAME Recovery Tank, discharging to the ground.