Translate
Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19101025 E01 I Lead.
Inspection Nr: 898229.015
Citation: 02001B
Citation Type: Repeat
Abatement Date: 02/21/2020 2
Initial Penalty: $0.00
Current Penalty: $0.00
Issuance Date: 09/24/2013
Nr Instances: 13
Nr Exposed: 13
Related Event Code (REC):
Gravity: 10
Report ID: 0728500
Contest Date: 11/08/2013
Final Order: 06/02/2014
Emphasis:
Substance: 1591
| Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penalty | P: Petition to Mod Abatement | $0.00 | 07/11/2019 | Repeat | ||
| Penalty | P: Petition to Mod Abatement | $0.00 | 11/12/2019 | Repeat | ||
| Penalty | P: Petition to Mod Abatement | $0.00 | 02/21/2020 | Repeat | ||
| Penalty | P: Petition to Mod Abatement | $0.00 | 08/31/2017 | Repeat | ||
| Penalty | P: Petition to Mod Abatement | $0.00 | 06/24/2019 | Repeat | ||
| Penalty | P: Petition to Mod Abatement | $0.00 | 06/15/2017 | Repeat | ||
| Penalty | P: Petition to Mod Abatement | $0.00 | 01/15/2017 | Repeat | ||
| Penalty | F: Formal Settlement | 06/02/2014 | $0.00 | 10/30/2014 | Repeat | |
| Penalty | F: Formal Settlement | 06/02/2014 | $0.00 | 10/30/2014 | Repeat | |
| Penalty | C: Contested | 11/12/2013 | $0.00 | 10/24/2013 | Repeat | |
| Penalty | Z: Issued | 09/24/2013 | $0.00 | 10/24/2013 | Repeat |
Text For Citation: 02 Item/Group: 001B Hazard:
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i): For any employees exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit for more than 30 days per year the employer did not implement engineering and work practice controls (including administrative controls) were not implemented to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead: (a) The employer failed to provide engineering and work practice controls to effectively reduce or minimize lead exposures in the workplace. (1) On or about May 16, 2013, a Battery Break employee operating the skid steer was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) level of 1052.8 ug/m3 of lead, which is 24.6 times the calculated OSHA permissible exposure level (PEL) of 42.7 ug/m3. (2) On or about May 16, 2013, a Battery Break employee at the lower saw location was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) level of 1062.0 ug/m3 of lead, which is 21.2 times the OSHA permissible exposure level (PEL) of 50 ug/m3. (3) On or about May 16, 2013, a Yard employee breaking slag and operating the pug mill was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) level of 484.4 ug/m3 of lead, which is 9.6 times the OSHA permissible exposure level (PEL) of 50 ug/m3. (4) On or about May 16, 2013, the Casting Lead who moves throughout the casting department where skimming, banding and stacking of lead ingots occurs, was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) level of 288.2 ug/m3 of lead, which is 5.7 times the OSHA permissible exposure level (PEL) of 50 ug/m3. (5) On or about May 16, 2013, the charge floor employee was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) level of 1709.9 ug/m3 of lead, which is 36.5 times the calculated OSHA permissible exposure level (PEL) of 46.89 ug/m3. (6) On or about May 16, 2013, the Blast Furnace operator was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) level of 505.4 ug/m3 of lead, which is 10.1 times the OSHA permissible exposure level (PEL) of 50 ug/m3. (7) On or about May 16, 2013, an employee was skimming kettles and was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) level of 417.7 ug/m3 of lead, which is 8.35 times the OSHA permissible exposure level (PEL) of 50 ug/m3. (8) On or about June 27, 2013, a casting employee was skimming kettles, stacking and banding lead ingots and was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) level of 111.0 ug/m3 of lead, which is 2.22 times the OSHA permissible exposure level (PEL) of 50 ug/m3. (9) On or about June 27, 2013, an employee was operating the furnace and was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) level of 131.4 ug/m3 of lead, which is 2.74 times the calculated OSHA permissible exposure level (PEL) of 48 ug/m3. (10) On or about June 27, 2013, a Yard employee was operating the sweeper and spraying down the driveways and was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) level of 57.3 ug/m3 of lead, which is 1.2 times the calculated OSHA permissible exposure level (PEL) of 47.3 ug/m3. (11) On or about June 27, 2013, a maintenance employee who was also a union steward performed a walk through the facility and was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) level of 63.0 ug/m3 of lead, which is 1.4 times the calculated OSHA permissible exposure level (PEL) of 43.6 ug/m3. (12) On or about June 27, 2013, a Battery Break employee was working at the upper saw and was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) level of 878.4 ug/m3 of lead, which is 19.96 times the calculated OSHA permissible exposure level (PEL) of 44 ug/m3. (13) On or about June 27, 2013, the Battery Break Lead was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) level of 321.6 ug/m3 of lead, which is 7.31 times the calculated OSHA permissible exposure level (PEL) of 44 ug/m3. EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD OR ITS EQUIVALENT STANDARD 29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i) WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 314181025, CITATION NUMBER 2, ITEM NUMBER 1B, ISSUED ON AUGUST 3, 2011, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 7471 SOUTH 5TH STREET, FRISCO, TEXAS 75034.